02 · ESOS · SECR · CRP

One tool, three deadlines, zero estimates.

Flannery Plant Hire — Europe's largest plant hire firm — runs 12 sites, 230 light vehicles and 45 HGVs from a Wembley head office. Three overlapping reporting regimes, three different consultants, three sets of numbers. KEES replaced the lot with one Energy & Carbon Management Tool — feeding ESOS, SECR and the Construction Reporting Protocol from a single source of measured data.

Industry
Construction · Plant hire
Location
Wembley HQ · UK-wide
Project
ESOS · SECR · CRP
Estate
12 sites · 275 vehicles

Projected savings

Calculated from audit findings · Annual basis
8.7%
Cost · % of total yearly spend

Cost reduction identified across head office, sites and the diesel fleet.

1.88mkWh
Energy · per year

Annual energy reduction available from prioritised actions across all 12 sites.

523tCO₂e
Carbon · per year

Equivalent carbon reduction — verified against actual fuel and grid factors, not estimates.

01 · The Challenge

Three reports, three sets of numbers, no one in agreement

Flannery had three compliance regimes and three numbers — and none of them matched.

ESOS, SECR and the Construction Reporting Protocol all want similar data, but cut differently. Flannery's reports were being assembled by separate consultants from spreadsheets that had drifted apart over the years — fuel cards in one place, electricity bills in another, telematics nowhere near either.

The brief: stop estimating. Get every kWh, every litre, every mile under one roof, once, and let the regimes draw from the same well.

The complication: a fleet that does most of the work. 230 light vehicles, 45 HGVs and a yard full of plant — Scope 1 dominates. Without proper telematics integration, fleet is the place every plant hire ESOS report quietly fudges.

02 · The Data

Where the carbon actually comes from.

Verified · measuredPre-KEES estimate (replaced)
Total annual emissions · 5,998 tCO₂e
Six categories. One source of truth.
Pre-KEES range
±18% across reports
HGV diesel · Scope 12,318
Plant on-site fuel · S11,866
LCV / vans · Scope 1945
Yard electricity · S2552
Wembley HQ · S2219
Heating gas · S198
Source · ECMT v2.1 · FY 2024–25Data lineage · Telematics · Fuel cards · DNO metersSites covered · 12 of 12 · 100%

Telematics-grade fleet data

Per-vehicle litres & idle time pulled monthly. No more 'average mpg × bills' — actual emissions, per asset.

Yard electricity de-fudged

Half-hour DNO data on every yard meter, replacing supplier-estimated reads that drifted year-to-year.

One source, three reports

The same database now exports SECR boundary, ESOS audit ledger and CRP project rollups — automatically.

03 · Key Findings

Six themes — and a tool that owns them.

F.01

HGV idle & route inefficiency

~14% of HGV fuel burned at idle or in unnecessary repositioning. Visible per-vehicle once telematics fed the tool.

F.02

Plant fuel allocation

On-site fuel was being booked to whichever site placed the order, not the one running the machine. Project carbon was off.

F.03

LCV right-sizing

A subset of the LCV fleet was over-spec for typical load. Replacement cycle now staged against route data, not category.

F.04

Yard lighting & idle loads

Out-of-hours yard load was 45% of operational — security lighting and welfare cabins on 24/7 unnecessarily.

F.05

HQ heating controls

Wembley HQ BMS had drifted out of schedule. Recommissioning gave back 12% of HQ gas — the easiest win on the list.

F.06

Reporting cycle integration

ESOS audit, SECR ledger and CRP project carbon now run from one ECMT instance. No re-keying, no estimate drift.

04 · The KEES Approach

Build the source of truth. Then make it earn its keep.

We didn't start with the report — we started with the data. Once everyone agrees on the numbers, the reports almost write themselves and the savings stop being theoretical.

STEP 01

Map every data feed in the business

Fuel cards, telematics platforms, DNO meters, supplier portals, BMS exports. Twelve sites, three platforms — none of them talking to each other.

STEP 02

Build the Energy & Carbon Management Tool

Single consolidated database with monthly automated pulls. Per-asset, per-site, per-project — granular enough to support any of the regimes.

STEP 03

Reconcile against bills & statutory submissions

Every measured value cross-checked against invoiced fuel and metered electricity. Variance < 1.5% — within audit tolerance.

STEP 04

Run all three regimes from the same well

ESOS audit ledger, SECR boundary, CRP project carbon — three exports, one underlying dataset. No more arguments about whose number is right.

STEP 05

Hand the tool over & train internally

The tool is Flannery's, not ours. We ran a four-week handover with the SHEQ team — they own the monthly cycle now.

05 · Timeline

Four months from brief to handover.

Total elapsed · 16 weeks · 2024–25
Wk 0 · DiscoveryData auditMapped 11 input streams across 12 sites and HQ.
Wk 4 · BuildECMT liveTool built, monthly automated pulls in place.
Wk 10 · Reports3 outputsESOS, SECR & CRP exports drawn from same DB.
Wk 16 · HandoverSHEQ owns itInternal training complete. Annual cycle internalised.
Sites consolidated
12 / 12
Data variance vs bills
< 1.5%
Reports unified
3 / 3
See ESOS service
06 · Client testimonial
Before KEES, we had three teams reporting three different numbers, and I couldn't tell you which was right. Now it's one tool, one team, one number — and we use it to actually run the business, not just survive the audit.
PW
Patrick Walsh
Group SHEQ Director · Flannery Plant Hire
Get started

Three reports, three numbers? Let's fix that.

If your fleet, sites and reports are pulling from different spreadsheets, you're not alone. Tell us your set-up — we'll be honest about whether one tool can replace your three.